Research papers are
clustered in 11 paper blocks sorted according to subject matter. 3 to 5 papers
are presented by the researchers themselves to a body composed of a critic
deemed an academic expert in the field, to the College of Mass Communication
faculty and to the registered participants. At end of the presentation, the
critic criticizes and presents inputs that can broaden the perspective of the
study from their field of expertise. Outputs are captured on Facebook #8thSdP,
Twitter and on AM radio DZUP 1602 MHz.
For a sampling on the
approach, I expound on the last paper block tagged as "Dutertismo: Dead Bodies,
The Simularca and the Real". 3 papers tackle the use of non-traditional forms of
media such as blogs, photos and video games that promote the platform of
current president RRD.
A research
investigates on the messaging of a blog “For the Motherland” owned by Sass
Rogando Sasot by an undergraduate Kim Jem D.L. Muana. Against the theoretical
framework of Encoding/Decoding Theory of Stuart Hall (1980), Kim Muana provides
an analysis on how Sassot understands and disseminates information about the
concept of federalism and how her followers react to, comment on.
Perspective given by
Cleve Arguelles, a populist and an Assistant Professor and Chair of Political
Science Program University of the Philippines Manila encourages researchers to
broaden discussion points.
I paraphrase the
professor’s response. Tatay Digong is a welcome interruption to our
elite-dominated politics. His approach is innovative (and pervasive) which
opens researchers to find alternative channels of politics. Critic challenges
researchers to be innovative, challenging disciplinary boundaries and
questioning shared assumptions, to go beyond the known.
He offers 3 points in
response to the papers presented: 1. Use of entertainment e.g. video games 2.
Beyond 3G. Guns. Goons. Gold. Add the 4th G-Gigabytes such as social media e.g.
blogs, digital spheres 3. Dead bodies in photos as political symbols. Avoid
looking. Talk differently which begs for more studies on how the people engage
with the visuals. Prof. Cleve poses the question “what is voyeurism, what is
empathy?” Relating to “tokhang” he offers the idea of Judith Butler defining
which lives are “grievable”, and which are not.
He ends stating there
is much “broader context that made the rise of such a controversial leader
possible.” He implies exploring other discussion points as what gave rise to
the Duterte presidency and reflect on the emerging Philippines under his
presidency.
Research is about
proving a central argument. In the light of exciting times in Philippine politics
where we now exist in a highly polarized society, forums such as Sining Del
Pilar provide us with extreme positions fairly and force us to make a stand. Did
we understand better federalism? Are we voyeurs or do we empathize with the
victims of dead bodies? Do we become criminals when we play Fighting Crimes 2? Through
the researchers’ studies, their expertise and the disciplined critique, we are objectively
enlightened and challenged. This opens up more arguments to prove and more
researches to conduct.